Free Tool

ATS Resume Score Checker

Check how well your resume reads to Applicant Tracking Systems. Paste your resume (and optionally a job description) for an ATS-readiness estimate based on common ATS patterns.

📎 Or drop a .txt / .docx file — or browse

Paste your resume to see your ATS-readiness score and checklist.

Your resume is analysed only in your browser — it's never uploaded. We email only your score, and only if you ask.

Need a career or HR platform built? Parix.ai builds SaaS & web apps.

Book a free consultation →
Before you apply

See your resume the way the software does

Most applications never reach a human first. An Applicant Tracking System parses your resume into fields, scores it against the job description and ranks it. A strong candidate with a badly formatted file can lose to a weaker one that simply parses cleanly.

Paste your resume and the job description, and see the match the way an ATS would — keyword overlap, formatting risk and section structure — before you submit anything.

Why a polished resume can score zero

A file can look immaculate in Word or as a PDF and still extract into nonsense. Text boxes, multi-column layouts and graphics-based headers frequently fail to parse — the system sees garbled or missing text where a person sees a clean design.

  • Two candidates with comparable experience apply. One uses a two-column template with a graphic sidebar for skills; the other is single-column with standard headings.
  • The sidebar fails to parse into any recognised field. From the system’s point of view those skills are simply not listed.
  • That is the gap this closes: catching the formatting problem before the application, not after a rejection with no explanation.
Two similar candidates, one role
Two-column template
LooksDesigned
Skills sidebarNot extracted
System seesNo skills listed
Parsed badly
Single column
LooksPlain
Skills sectionExtracted
System seesMost keywords matched
Parsed clean
Comparable experience. The difference is the template, and only one of them gets read.

What gets scored

Three things, and they fail in different ways — which is why a single overall number is less useful than knowing which of the three is weak.

  • Keyword overlap against the job description — what the ranking actually runs on.
  • Formatting risk — tables, columns, graphics, and anything near the contact details.
  • Section structure — whether standard headings exist for the parser to find.
A marketing manager application
Keyword match
5 of 8
Formatting risk
Low
Section structure
Standard
Overall
71/100
Three missing keywords, clean formatting. That is a ten-minute fix, not a rewrite.

Using the match score honestly

A low score rarely means rewrite everything. It usually means a handful of specific terms are missing, or one formatting choice is creating risk.

  • Add missing keywords where they are genuinely true of your experience. “Ran split tests on landing pages” is true, so add “A/B testing”.
  • Do not stuff in terms you cannot back up in an interview. Never used HubSpot? Leave it out.
  • Fix flagged formatting first — particularly tables, columns or graphics near your contact details.
Three missing terms, judged honestly
"Ran split tests" → A/B testingTrue, add it
"Campaigns for software clients" → B2BTrue, add it
HubSpotNever used it, leave out
Add what is true. The interview checks the rest

Your resume stays in your browser

Scoring happens on your own device, which matters when the document contains your address, your phone number and your current employer.

  • Your resume and the job description are processed locally for scoring.
  • They are not stored on our servers, and there is no account to create.
  • Which means you can check a real application rather than a sanitised copy.
Where your resume goes
parix.ai/free-ai-tools/ats-resume-checker/
Scored here, on your device
nothing stored
Parix.ai serverUsed to score, then not kept.
The short version

Four numbers worth keeping

3
Things scored: keywords, formatting, structure.
1
Column. Multi-column templates are the usual parsing failure.
0
Keywords worth adding that you cannot defend in an interview.
101
Free tools on Parix.ai, none of them behind a sign-up.
Free, and staying free

Why Parix.ai gives this away

A rejection with no explanation is often a parsing failure rather than a judgement, and that is a fixable problem nobody tells you about. These tools are how people find us — which is why there is no paywall and no sign-up.

Check my resume

Who uses it

Anyone applying through an online portal, and anyone who has sent twenty applications and heard nothing — which is more often a formatting problem than a credentials one.

Pair it with

Build a clean, single-column file with the Resume Builder, and tighten the wording with the Grammar Checker before you send it.

What the score is not

It is not a judgement of your experience. It measures how well a parser reads your file and how closely the wording matches one specific job description — both of which you can fix in an afternoon.

Questions answered

Frequently asked questions

Everything you might be wondering about the ATS Resume Score Checker.

How does the ATS checker work?
It checks your resume text for things applicant tracking systems commonly struggle with: contact details, standard section headings, dates, bullet points, tables or columns, length, action verbs, measurable results and, if you paste one, keyword overlap with the job description. It gives an estimate; it is not a real ATS.
Is it free?
Yes. Check your resume as many times as you like, and the scoring runs in your browser.
What should I do with a low score?
Work through the specific fixes it lists, starting with the checks marked with a cross, then check again. Tailor your resume to each job description.
See it in action

A worked example

Real input, real output — so you know what to expect before you run it yourself.

A short marketing resume against a job ad
Sample input
A 67-word resume with an email address but no phone number, plus a job description for a senior marketing manager
Sample output
Score 58/100 (Fair). It flags the missing phone number, the low word count (aim for roughly 400-800), the lack of measurable results and the missing keywords, and confirms standard headings and parseable dates.